Skip to main content
milly logo
Tactical · prose M06 The Market · M&A Market Intelligence

Demand fell. Prices didn't.

By every standard supply-and-demand rule, 2023 should have produced multiple compression: deal volume stepped down from the peak and the dominant buyer cohort pulled back to navigate debt. Instead, valuations for quality brokerages held near record highs. Understanding why is a lesson in how this market actually prices.

2023 is the year that teaches how this market prices — because it behaved opposite to the textbook. Demand cooled and a primary buyer cohort stepped back, and standard logic says prices should fall. For quality firms, they didn't. This single-year case sits inside the broader new-normal thesis.

§ 01 · The setup for compressionEverything pointed down.

The conditions all pointed toward lower prices. Deal volume stepped materially down from the 2021 peak, continuing the post-bubble moderation. PE-backed buyers — roughly 70% of deal activity — pulled back as several long-time players moved to the sidelines to navigate debt positions and integration backlogs, and the survivors became far more selective about deploying newly finite capital. A volume decline, a primary buyer cohort restructuring, and a higher cost of capital: by any standard framework, that combination should compress multiples meaningfully.

§ 02 · Why they heldThree structural factors.

Instead, the quality multiple held. Three structural factors explain it.

The multiple-arbitrage flywheel. The large publicly traded brokers — the proxy for PE platform valuations — kept trading at premium multiples, near 18× EBITDA. As long as the exit-side multiple holds, the entry-side holds: a PE buyer can pay 12–13× for an agency because the earnings will trade at 18–20× when folded into a platform or sold on. Record seller profitability. What buyers were paying for got materially better — private brokers posted record organic growth and EBITDA margins above 20%, so higher-quality earnings justified persistent multiples even as buyer count thinned. And demand softened but didn't collapse: the field still held 35-plus active national-scale buyers working hard to close. Soft is not the same as weak.

2023 valuation resilienceValue
Quality $3M–$10M multiple~12.5× EBITDA (flat vs prior year)
Public-broker EBITDA multiple~18×
Public-broker revenue multiple~5.6×
Active national-scale buyers35+
Private-broker EBITDA margins20%+

§ 03 · Quality polarizationWhat actually changed.

The real 2023 story wasn't market-wide compression — it was quality polarization. Multiples for quality brokerages held; multiples for mediocre firms compressed materially. Quality books drew competitive processes with multiple credible bidders at full multiples; weaker firms faced far fewer suitors, lower valuations, and willing-buyer-only dynamics. After the 2020–2022 "everyone gets bid" environment, that divergence was a substantial change — buyers became far more selective about which firms they would court aggressively. The arbitrage math underneath it all is detailed in modern valuation methodologies.

Journal axiom · 1 of 2

Falling volume didn't lower prices — it sharpened the question. In 2023 the market stopped asking "is it for sale?" and started asking "is it any good?" — and only the second question moved a multiple.

§ 04 · What it means for sellersQuality is the variable.

The lesson is direct: in a polarized market, listing quality is the load-bearing variable. A mediocre book faces buyer indifference; a quality book still draws competitive bidding at full multiples — so the value-realization work shifts decisively to demonstrable book quality, retention, organic growth, and producer depth. With the buyer field thinner but still competitive, match quality matters more than ever — surfacing the right buyers for the right book on transparent criteria becomes the difference between a competitive process and a single willing buyer. The year-end retrospective that confirmed the resilience held into 2024 is the golden-era snapshot.

Terminology on this shelf

Multiple-arbitrage flywheel
The mechanism where high public-broker exit multiples support the entry multiples PE pays for acquisitions.
Quality polarization
The 2023 pattern where quality firms held their multiples while mediocre ones compressed.
Willing-buyer-only dynamics
The weak-firm market state of few suitors and no competitive tension, versus quality firms' multi-bidder processes.
Public-broker multiple
The trading multiple of large listed brokers — a proxy for PE valuations and the flywheel's exit side.

From the market desk

The macro view, monthly.

Agency benchmarks, deal-volume data, and carrier signals — the market read for operators, buyers, and sellers. No marketing.

Anonymous by default · One click to unsubscribe