Skip to main content
milly logo
Tactical · prose S13 For Sellers · Deal Flow & Negotiation

Shareholders' & operating agreements — the internal constitution that decides who can approve a sale.

Where the Buy-Sell defines what happens when an owner departs, the Shareholders' Agreement (corporations) or Operating Agreement (LLCs) defines the everyday governance rules — voting rights, profit allocation, management authority, ownership transfer restrictions. During M&A, the document answers the question buyers care about most: who actually has the authority to approve the sale, and what stake do minority owners have in stopping it?

The Shareholders' Agreement looks administrative. It is not. During an acquisition, it is the document that decides whether the deal closes on the seller's intended terms or stalls on a minority owner's veto. Buyers read it first; they price it accordingly. A clear agreement with strong drag-along rights signals a deal that can close cleanly. An ambiguous or missing agreement signals a closing process that may require separate negotiation with every minority shareholder.

§ 01 · Entity type and document choiceFunctionally equivalent, terminologically distinct.

Corporations (C-Corp, S-Corp) use a Shareholders' Agreement that governs relationships between shareholders. LLCs use an Operating Agreement (also called a Members Agreement) governing relationships between members. Despite the terminology difference, both serve the same core purpose: establishing governance rules, ownership rights, and transfer restrictions. The substantive provisions are nearly identical.

§ 02 · Voting thresholdsWhat requires a majority, what requires more.

The agreement specifies what percentage of owners must approve major decisions. Routine decisions typically require simple majority (50% + 1). Major decisions — sale of the entire business, merger or acquisition, change in business purpose, sale of substantial assets, dissolution, significant debt financing, related-party transactions, admission of new partners, amendment to the agreement itself — typically require supermajority (66.67%) or unanimous consent.

The strategic implication for M&A is direct. An agreement requiring unanimous consent for sale makes acquisition harder; every minority owner has effective veto power. An agreement requiring only majority consent allows a coalition to push through a sale. Sellers contemplating sale should know which threshold applies before LOI signing — it shapes which minority shareholders need to be brought along and which can theoretically block.

§ 03 · Drag-Along and Tag-Along RightsThe provisions buyers care about most.

Drag-Along Rights. In a sale, majority owners can "drag" minority owners into the transaction on the same terms. Without drag-along, minority owners can hold out and refuse to sell, preventing the transaction from closing. Drag-along is the buyer's preferred provision — it guarantees they can acquire 100% ownership without negotiating with every minority shareholder individually.

Tag-Along Rights. Minority owners have the right to "tag along" on a sale initiated by majority owners, selling their shares on the same terms and conditions. Tag-along protects minority owners from being left behind in a partial sale that strips value from the business they remain in. It is the minority's preferred provision.

The M&A impact: an agreement with strong drag-along rights makes it easier for acquirers to achieve 100% ownership. An agreement without clear drag-along may require separate negotiation with minority shareholders — complicating closing, extending diligence, and creating leverage for the minority to extract premium terms.

§ 04 · The other four provisionsProfit allocation, management authority, restrictive covenants, deadlock.

Profit and Loss Allocation. Typically pro-rata to ownership stakes; sometimes non-pro-rata when capital and labor contributions differ. Some agencies allocate based on producer revenue sourced by each owner, creating variable profit-sharing that incentivizes production.

Management Authority. Manager-managed LLC (designated manager makes decisions), member-managed LLC (all members equal authority), or Corporation (Board makes major decisions, officers execute daily). Specifies whether partners can individually bind the firm to contracts/loans without other partners' approval — a critical risk control.

Restrictive Covenants. Many Shareholders'/Operating Agreements embed non-compete and non-solicitation clauses directly. Consistency across documents (Buy-Sell, Shareholders' Agreement, separate Restrictive Covenants agreement) is critical — contradictions become litigation.

Deadlock Resolution. For partnerships with even ownership (50/50, 33/33/33), agreements often include mechanisms to resolve deadlock — the Shotgun Clause (one partner offers a price; other chooses whether to sell or buy at that price), Russian Roulette (one partner sets the price; other chooses to buy or sell), or Forced Sale / Dissolution.

§ 05 · The CAUV as annual revalidationWhere governance meets valuation.

The Certificate of Agreed Value (CAUV) is the simple annual document that ties the governance framework to the buy-sell pricing mechanism. Post year-end, owners review financials, discuss valuation, agree on a number, sign the certificate. The CAUV converts valuation from a contested legal dispute into a calm business decision made during a planning meeting.

The strategic value is operational discipline. Most agencies intend to update valuations annually but rarely do. The last CAUV is often 5+ years old, rendering the buy-sell agreement effectively ineffective. An external valuation engine (like Milly Books') gives the CAUV discussion an objective anchor.

§ 06 · Integration with the buy-sellFive conflict points to resolve before sale.

The Shareholders'/Operating Agreement and Buy-Sell must be carefully integrated. Five typical conflict points: voting rights (one document requires unanimous consent, another allows majority); valuation (the agreements reference different methods); triggering events (disability defined differently); funding (life insurance obligations not addressed in the governance document); and restrictive covenants (different durations or scopes).

The best practice is explicit cross-reference. The Buy-Sell should state: "Valuation shall be determined per the Certificate of Agreed Value maintained pursuant to Section X of the Shareholders' Agreement." Without that anchoring language, buyers conducting diligence flag the inconsistency, and the seller spends weeks reconciling documents instead of negotiating terms.

Journal axiom · 4 of 7

The Shareholders' Agreement is the document that decides whether a sale can close cleanly or requires separate negotiation with every minority owner. Drag-along rights and clear voting thresholds are not legal niceties. They are the structural difference between a 60-day close and a 180-day closing struggle.

Terminology on this shelf

Shareholders' Agreement
Governance document for corporations; defines voting, profit allocation, management authority.
Operating Agreement
Governance document for LLCs; functionally equivalent to Shareholders' Agreement.
CAUV
Annual document where owners attest to current fair business value.
Voting Threshold
Percentage of ownership required to approve major decisions.
Drag-Along Rights
Majority can force minority shareholders into transaction on same terms.
Tag-Along Rights
Right of minority to participate in sale on same terms as majority.
Deadlock Resolution
Mechanism (shotgun clause, forced sale) to resolve owner disagreements.

From the seller theme

One piece every other Tuesday.

The next long-form piece in your inbox the morning it goes live. No marketing. Unsubscribe in one click.

Anonymous by default · One click to unsubscribe