Skip to main content
milly logo
Tactical · prose S03 For Sellers · Exit Paths

Minority equity investment — joining an IMOE as a third exit path.

A distinct exit path that solves the seller's dilemma — how to access the benefits of a larger-firm partnership without the negatives of selling out. The Independent Broker with Minority Outside Equity structure has produced a handful of marquee transactions in 2023–2024 (Lawley/PPC; Leavitt/Capital Z) that map a viable third path between full independence and full PE sale.

Joining an Independent Broker with Minority Outside Equity is a distinct exit path that solves what Reagan Consulting calls the seller's dilemma. Peer brokers searching for an exit path face a real tension. They can stay fully independent — preserve culture, control, and team but lack capital, scale, and exit liquidity. They can sell to a PE-backed acquirer — get top-of-market valuation and capital but lose control, possibly culture, and full exit forces decision finality. Or they can sell to a public broker or mega-cap — similar trade-offs, often with more bureaucracy. Joining an IMOE provides a third path.

§ 01 · What an IMOE offersThe combination Reagan calls "holy grail."

Market valuations competitive with the most aggressive PE-backed buyers — landing in the 10–12× competitive band of the canonical valuation framework and pushing into the 12–19× kill-zone band for platform-thesis assets. Employee-owned, client-centric culture that more naturally aligns with founder values. Equity opportunity for the seller's employees as broad and deep as desired, with rollover-equity amounts customizable per individual. The "buy-in rather than sell-out" framing — the seller's people become equity participants in the larger combined entity. Expanded role and growth opportunity for current and emerging leaders. Collaborative resource-sharing philosophy. Lack of bureaucratic big-company policies and procedures.

Journal axiom · 1 of 7

The IMOE proposition is not "as good as PE but slightly less money." It is "competitive with PE on price, with structural advantages on culture and team continuity." For the right seller, the IMOE is the dominant offer — not the second-best one.

§ 02 · The Lawley/PPC pattern (October 2023)The senior-firm join.

Lawley — one of the largest, fastest-growing brokers in the Northeast — founded 1945, based in Buffalo, 500+ employees, branches across NY, NJ, and CT. Pritzker Private Capital, a family direct-investing leader, took the minority stake. The deal mechanics: PPC's investment supports Lawley in expanding into new markets and scaling service offerings; provides a pathway for continued independence for the next generation of employee-owners. Continued leadership: Bill Lawley Jr., Chris Ross, Mike Lawley. Reagan Consulting was exclusive financial advisor. This is an example of a senior firm joining the IMOE structure rather than founding it.

§ 03 · The Leavitt/Capital Z pattern (December 2024)The platform-scale join.

Leavitt Group — ranked #26 on Business Insurance Top 100 — Cedar City, UT-based, $500M+ annual revenues, ~3,000 employees, US-wide footprint, unique integrated co-ownership model, ~20 acquisitions per year since 2017, consistent organic growth alongside M&A. Capital Z Partners, an experienced insurance distribution investor, took the minority stake. The Leavitt family maintains controlling ownership position; continued leadership: Eric Leavitt as Executive Chairman & CEO. The Capital Z investment allows Leavitt to "build on its past success in the next chapter." Reagan Securities was exclusive financial advisor. This is what platform-scale IMOE looks like.

§ 04 · Compelling benefits for the IMOE-joining sellerBeyond the multiple.

Per Reagan's December 2024 framing, an IMOE provides several benefits to a seller who joins one rather than going PE: resets valuation to market levels — sellers capture the current premium-multiple environment; enhances M&A competitive ability — institutional capital relationships unlock larger acquisitions; maintains employee-controlled ownership position — preserves the culture and motivation alignment; provides partial liquidity for shareholders — allows retiring principals to monetize without forcing full exit on remaining team; increases access to capital markets — relationships with institutional investors open. Sellers explicitly opting for IMOE-style outcomes (preserve culture, partial liquidity, ongoing employment) signal a different buyer-fit profile than sellers seeking maximum-multiple PE exit.

§ 05 · Who this path is right forFour ICP fits.

ICP-02a (Retiring Principal).

Especially those who prioritize culture and staff over last-dollar price. The IMOE structure protects the team they spent decades building. The "buy-in" structure can be designed to include the operating-leader cohort, not just the founder.

ICP-02b (Partial Exit Seller).

The "buy-in rather than sell-out" framing literally describes their preference structure. Partial liquidity now, ongoing equity participation in a larger entity, no forced full-exit finality.

ICP-02d (Opportunistic Seller).

The IMOE option provides a credible counter-offer to a PE-backed unsolicited bid — same valuation band, better cultural fit. The leverage is real precisely because the IMOE is an actual competitive alternative, not a rhetorical one.

ICP-02e (Non-Perpetuating Principal).

When internal perpetuation has failed, IMOE provides a path that approximates internal continuity better than a PE sale does — the employee-equity structure picks up much of what failed internal succession was reaching for.

§ 06 · Who this path is not right forThe disqualifying conditions.

Smaller agencies (under $50M revenue typically) — IMOEs prefer to acquire larger firms. Sellers prioritizing maximum liquidity at close — PE deals can offer more upfront cash than an IMOE structure typically delivers. Sellers wanting full exit and clean break — IMOE structures expect ongoing engagement. Sellers whose firms aren't a strong cultural match for the specific IMOE platform — the structure's preservation-of-culture promise depends on the cultures being similar enough to combine without integration friction.

The smaller-agency adjacent strategy.

While direct IMOE participation requires a $50M+ revenue agency, smaller agencies can pursue IMOE-adjacent outcomes by selling to a larger firm that is itself an IMOE. Tuck-in and Geographic Extender buyers within IMOE platforms are themselves attractive buyers — culturally aligned, capital-backed, with the same employee-equity DNA the seller would have preferred to join directly.

The first major IMOE deal closed in 2009 (Higginbotham + Stone Point Capital). By late 2024, the structure had produced at least seven Top-100 IMOE firms. The path is not theoretical — but it is selective.

Terminology on this shelf

IMOE
Independent Broker with Minority Outside Equity — the buyer/seller-target structure where institutional capital takes a minority position in a private broker.
Seller's Dilemma
The trade-off between independence (preserved control, culture) and selling out (capital, scale, exit liquidity). IMOEs offer a middle path.
Minority Equity Investment
Capital infusion in exchange for a less-than-controlling equity stake.
Rollover Equity
Portion of seller proceeds reinvested as equity in the acquiring entity. IMOEs offer especially flexible rollover structures.
Buy-in vs. Sell-out
IMOE positioning framing — sellers' employees become equity participants in the combined entity rather than transitional employees of an acquirer.

From the seller theme

One piece every other Tuesday.

The next long-form piece in your inbox the morning it goes live. No marketing. Unsubscribe in one click.

Anonymous by default · One click to unsubscribe